AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General Weather-related Discussi... <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
![]() |
Mike Powell | All | HVYRAIN: Excess Rain D1-2 |
July 28, 2025 3:11 PM * |
||
FOUS30 KWBC 281946 QPFERD Excessive Rainfall Discussion NWS Weather Prediction Center College Park MD 346 PM EDT Mon Jul 28 2025 Day 1 Valid 16Z Mon Jul 28 2025 - 12Z Tue Jul 29 2025 ...THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL OVER PORTIONS OF THE NORTHERN PLAINS AND UPPER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY.. ...Northern Plains to Upper MS Valley... 16Z update... Some eastward nudge of the Slight Risk further into Wisconsin and Iowa was made to prefect the latest guidance and WPC trend. The best focus for higher accumulations and rainfall rates continue to be across southern Minnesota and the surrounding areas. Campbell Convection will move across portions of eastern MT and into the western Dakotas this morning. Heavy rainfall rates with this activity will pose a localized flash flood risk, however generally quick cell motions should limit the extent of the threat. As we head into the afternoon and evening hours this convection will grow upscale into an MCS as it moves across central SD into southern MN and northern IA. A forward propagating derecho is likely given the environmental ingredients in place and per SPC. This fast forward motion will likely cap the extent of any flash flood risk at the Slight level. The impressive CAPE and PWs around 2" near and just downstream of the MCS will support heavy rainfall rates. As the MCS matures the heaviest rainfall totals may end up near the developing comma head/bookend vortex where rainfall duration will be locally longer. The 00z HREF supports total rainfall over 2", with a narrow axis of over 3" probable as well. Portions of eastern SD into southwest MN received heavy rainfall this past night...and so if an additional 2-3" falls over these areas then isolated to scattered flash flooding is likely. Elsewhere, the threat is likely an urban risk driven by hourly rainfall locally as high as 2" as the MCS moves through. ...Southwest... 16Z update... The Marginal Risk was expanded southeast toward the Big Bend area of West Texas. Abundant mid-level moisture will be present during this period and some of the CAMs are hinting at thunderstorm development will take place this afternoon and evening. Campbell Another day of scattered afternoon convection expected across much of NM into far southeast AZ. Both PWs and CAPE are forecast to be higher today compared to yesterday, and so do anticipate a bit more convective coverage today. Activity will initially develop near areas of terrain, such as the Sacramento Mountains and Sangre De Cristos. Given the moisture and instability in place...at least an isolated flash flood threat is likely on/near these higher terrain areas, especially over the more sensitive burn scars. Cells may tend to be transient today...either moving off to the west and/or dissipating fairly quickly, which may keep the flash flood coverage isolated in nature. Convection could actually persist into the overnight hours over portions of southern NM...but the extent of instability by this time is unclear, and so rainfall rates should be tempered by this time. Overall this is a solid Marginal risk with isolated flash flooding likely, but at the moment think the risk falls just shy of Slight risk level coverage. ...OH Valley into the Carolinas... Isolated to scattered thunderstorms are expected today across a broad area stretching from KY/TN to southern MI and all the way to the coastal Carolinas. Generally not expecting much organization to convection...but PWs of around 2" (or higher) will continue to support heavy rainfall rates. Localized rainfall of 2-3" are possible within the Marginal risk area...and while the coverage of these amounts should be small...where it does fall some flash flood impacts are possible within areas of lowered FFG. The most concentrated probabilities in the HREF are actually over the coastal Carolinas, where a convergence axis should drive more convective coverage and some totals locally over 3". However with higher FFG over these areas the flash flood risk is still expected to stay isolated. Chenard Day 2 Valid 12Z Tue Jul 29 2025 - 12Z Wed Jul 30 2025 ...THERE IS A SLIGHT RISK OF EXCESSIVE RAINFALL OVER PORTIONS OF THE CENTRAL AND NORTHERN PLAINS AND FOR PORTIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST... ...Central and Northern Plains... 21Z update... The trend of shifting the QPF footprint further east across the central U.S. persisted with the most recent run of guidance. Portions of southern Iowa, northwest Missouri and northern Kansas saw an uptick in coverage and amounts for this period. As such the Slight Risk area was expanded on its eastern boundary to cover this part of the region. Hourly rain rates of 1-2 inches/hour still expected to pass through the Plains toward the Midwest. Campbell A stationary front will likely extend across southern IA/NE and into the High Plains on Tuesday afternoon/evening. Easterly flow to the north of this front will likely help trigger convective development over the High Plains as shortwave energy moves out of the Rockies and upper level divergence increases in the right entrance region of an upper jet. This activity will likely push east into the overnight hours across NE and eventually IA along/north of the stationary front. Upscale development into an MCS appears probable driving a heavy rainfall threat. Any eventual MCS will probably propagate off to the east fairly quickly, however additional development downstream over NE/IA is possible given the convergence near the front and what should be CAPE around 4000 j/kg. PWs should be plenty high enough for heavy rainfall, ranging from 1.5" in the High Plains to locally over 2" from eastern NE into IA. There remains some latitudinal uncertainty with the axis of convection during this period...although the general trend has been for a slightly farther south axis. There is also some question as to how far east the risk exists, with the deterministic and ensemble EC and the 00z RRFS/REFS favoring NE, but the GFS and AIFS extending the threat into IA. Given a favorable track record for the AIFS and the presence of the boundary/instability/PWs over IA, we did want to make sure that the Slight risk at least covered into central IA. ...Southwest... 21Z update... The signal for heavy rainfall increased for portions of New Mexico and far southwest Arizona for this period. Much of this part of the region is sensitive to higher rainfall intensities/amounts. In coordination with the local forecast offices concern was raised for not only recent burn scars but also the Sangre de Cristo Mountains and possibly the Gila region of southwest NM. A Slight Risk was raised for this period to cover this increased threat for local flash flooding potential. Campbell Another day of scattered afternoon convection expected Tuesday. Probabilities from both the 00z HREF and REFS show a bit more persistence of high 1"/hr exceedance over the Sacramento Mountains and vicinity. Thus the flash flood risk over these areas, and the susceptible burn scars, may very well be higher Tuesday than Monday. However there are some questions regarding the coverage of heavier rainfall amounts away from these terrain areas, as the overall coverage could be a bit less than Monday. Given the small extent of the higher risk at the moment and the uncertainty on the broader coverage, we will leave the ERO at a Marginal level pending what happens Monday. Although locally significant impacts are possible within/near the Sacramento Mountain burn scars. ...Southeast... Expecting greater convective coverage on Tuesday from the Southeast into the southern Appalachians. Not much in the way of forcing to organize convection, and generally expecting pulse activity that does not last all that long at any one location. This will act as a limiting factor for flash flooding...however there should be enough convective coverage that some cell mergers along outflows will be a possibility. PWs in the region are forecast between 2" and 2.3", with CAPE over 2000 j/kg...so the thermodynamic environment will support heavy rainfall rates. Thus even with a relatively short duration of rain at any one location, rainfall totals locally over 3" appear probable driving a localized flash flood risk. Chenard $$ --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (618:250/1) |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to General Weather-related Discussi... <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
![]() Execution Time: 0.0146 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |