Feed: Slashdot
Feed Link: https://slashdot.org/
---

Title: The Dead Need Right To Delete Their Data So They Can't Be AI-ified,
Lawyer Says

Link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/08/11/22482...

Legal scholar Victoria Haneman argues that U.S. law should grant estates a
time-limited right to delete a deceased person's data so they can't be
recreated by AI without their consent. "Digital resurrection by or through AI
requires the personal data of the deceased, and the amount of data that we
are storing online is increasing exponentially with each passing year,"
writes Haneman in an article published earlier this year in the Boston
College Law Review. "It has been said that data is the new uranium,
extraordinarily valuable and potentially dangerous. A right to delete will
provide the decedent with a time-limited right for deletion of personal
data." The Register reports: A living person may have some say on the matter
through the control of personal digital documents and correspondence. But a
dead person can't object, and US law doesn't offer the dead much data
protection in terms of privacy law, property law, intellectual property law,
or criminal law. The Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act
(RUFADAA), a law developed to help fiduciaries deal with digital files of the
dead or incapacitated, can come into play. But Haneman points out that most
people die intestate (without a will), leaving matters up to tech platforms.
Facebook's response to dead users is to allow anyone to request the
memorialization of an account, which keeps posts online. As for RUFADAA, it
does little to address digital resurrection, says Haneman. The right to
publicity, which provides a private right of action against unauthorized
commercial use of a person's name, image, or likeness, covers the dead in
about 25 states, according to Haneman. But the monetization of publicity
rights has proven to be problematic. Haneman says that there are some states
where it's theoretically possible to be prosecuted for libeling or defaming
the deceased, such as Idaho, Nevada, and Oklahoma, but adds that such
prosecutions have declined because they tread upon the constitutional right
to free expression. [...] A recent California law, the Delete Act, which took
effect last year, is the first to offer a way for the living to demand the
deletion of personal data from data brokers in one step. But according to
Haneman, it's unclear whether the text of the law will be extended to cover
the dead -- a possibility think tank Aspen Tech Policy Hub supports [PDF].
Haneman argues that a data deletion law for the dead would be grounded in
laws governing human remains, where corpses receive protection against abuse
despite being neither a person nor property. "The personal representative of
the decedent has the right to destroy all physical letters and photographs
saved by the decedent; merely storing personal information in the cloud
should not grant societal archival rights," she argues. "A limited right of
deletion within a twelve-month window balances the interests of society
against the rights of the deceased."

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

---
VRSS v2.1.180528