AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Slashdot <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
![]() |
VRSS | All | How the Music Industry is Building the Tech to Hunt Down AI-Gene |
June 22, 2025 1:00 PM |
||
Feed: Slashdot Feed Link: https://slashdot.org/ --- Title: How the Music Industry is Building the Tech to Hunt Down AI-Generated Songs Link: https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/25/0... The goal isn't to stop generative music, but to make it traceable, reports the Verge - "to identify it early, tag it with metadata, and govern how it moves through the system...." "Detection systems are being embedded across the entire music pipeline: in the tools used to train models, the platforms where songs are uploaded, the databases that license rights, and the algorithms that shape discovery." Platforms like YouTube and [French music streaming service] Deezer have developed internal systems to flag synthetic audio as it's uploaded and shape how it surfaces in search and recommendations. Other music companies - including Audible Magic, Pex, Rightsify, and SoundCloud - are expanding detection, moderation, and attribution features across everything from training datasets to distribution... Vermillio and Musical AI are developing systems to scan finished tracks for synthetic elements and automatically tag them in the metadata. Vermillio's TraceID framework goes deeper by breaking songs into stems - like vocal tone, melodic phrasing, and lyrical patterns - and flagging the specific AI-generated segments, allowing rights holders to detect mimicry at the stem level, even if a new track only borrows parts of an original. The company says its focus isn't takedowns, but proactive licensing and authenticated release... A rights holder or platform can run a finished track through [Vermillo's] TraceID to see if it contains protected elements - and if it does, have the system flag it for licensing before release. Some companies are going even further upstream to the training data itself. By analyzing what goes into a model, their aim is to estimate how much a generated track borrows from specific artists or songs. That kind of attribution could enable more precise licensing, with royalties based on creative influence instead of post-release disputes... Deezer has developed internal tools to flag fully AI-generated tracks at upload and reduce their visibility in both algorithmic and editorial recommendations, especially when the content appears spammy. Chief Innovation Officer Aurelien Herault says that, as of April, those tools were detecting roughly 20 percent of new uploads each day as fully AI-generated - more than double what they saw in January. Tracks identified by the system remain accessible on the platform but are not promoted... Spawning AI's DNTP (Do Not Train Protocol) is pushing detection even earlier - at the dataset level. The opt-out protocol lets artists and rights holders label their work as off-limits for model training. Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader SonicSpike for sharing the article. Read more of this story at Slashdot. --- VRSS v2.1.180528 |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Slashdot <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
![]() Execution Time: 0.0153 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |