AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages!

You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges.

Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Slashdot  <--  <--- Return to Home Page
   Local Database  Slashdot   [241 / 244] RSS
 From   To   Subject   Date/Time 
Message   VRSS    All   Most Air Cleaning Devices Have Not Been Tested On People   August 20, 2025
 8:40 PM  

Feed: Slashdot
Feed Link: https://slashdot.org/
---

Title: Most Air Cleaning Devices Have Not Been Tested On People

Link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/25/08/20/2...

A new review of nearly 700 studies on portable air cleaners found that over
90% of them were tested in empty spaces, not on people, leaving major gaps in
evidence about whether these devices actually prevent infections or if they
might even cause harm by releasing chemicals like ozone or formaldehyde. The
Conversation reports: Many respiratory viruses, such as COVID-19 and
influenza, can spread through indoor air. Technologies such as HEPA filters,
ultraviolet light and special ventilation designs -- collectively known as
engineering infection controls -- are intended to clean indoor air and
prevent viruses and other disease-causing pathogens from spreading. Along
with our colleagues across three academic institutions and two government
science agencies, we identified and analyzed every research study evaluating
the effectiveness of these technologies published from the 1920s through 2023
-- 672 of them in total. These studies assessed performance in three main
ways: Some measured whether the interventions reduced infections in people;
others used animals such as guinea pigs or mice; and the rest took air
samples to determine whether the devices reduced the number of small
particles or microbes in the air. Only about 8% of the studies tested
effectiveness on people, while over 90% tested the devices in unoccupied
spaces. We found substantial variation across different technologies. For
example, 44 studies examined an air cleaning process called photocatalytic
oxidation, which produces chemicals that kill microbes, but only one of those
tested whether the technology prevented infections in people. Another 35
studies evaluated plasma-based technologies for killing microbes, and none
involved human participants. We also found 43 studies on filters
incorporating nanomaterials designed to both capture and kill microbes --
again, none included human testing.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

---
VRSS v2.1.180528
  Show ANSI Codes | Hide BBCodes | Show Color Codes | Hide Encoding | Hide HTML Tags | Show Routing
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Slashdot  <--  <--- Return to Home Page

VADV-PHP
Execution Time: 0.0129 seconds

If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster.
VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved.
Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf.
v2.1.250224