Feed: Engadget is a web magazine with obsessive daily coverage of everything new in gadgets and consumer electronics
Feed Link: https://www.engadget.com/
---

Title: The best gaming mouse in 2025

Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 07:00:36 +0000
Link: https://www.engadget.com/gaming/pc/best-gamin...

No gaming mouse will magically stop you from getting destroyed in Counter-
Strike or Call of Duty, but the right pick can give you a greater sense of
control while making your downtime more comfortable. In truth, which one is
ΓÇ£bestΓÇ¥ for you comes down to preference: Shape is king, as the mouse nerd
adage goes, and everyoneΓÇÖs hands are different. But to make things a little
easier, weΓÇÖve tested dozens of well-regarded gaming mice over the past
couple of years and picked out a few options that have glided above the rest.
After playing countless hours of CS2, Overwatch 2, Halo Infinite, Final
Fantasy XIV and more PC games, here are our picks for the best gaming mice
you can buy, broken down by shape and use case. WeΓÇÖve also included some
general advice to keep in mind during your search.

The best gaming mice

Other gaming mice we've tested The Lamzu Maya X. Jeff Dunn for Engadget

Note: The following is a selection of especially noteworthy mice we've
tested, not a comprehensive list of every single model weΓÇÖve ever put
through its paces.

Lamzu Maya X

The Lamzu Maya X is a great symmetrical mouse and a close competitor to the
Razer Viper V3 Pro. ItΓÇÖd be next in line for an honorable mention, as it
has most of the things we like about the Hitscan Hyperlight and Pulsar X2
CrazyLight: a smooth matte finish, a sturdy frame, easy-gliding feet,
accurate performance, a tight scroll wheel and a lightweight design (46g).
ItΓÇÖs close in size to the Viper V3 Pro, but itΓÇÖs cheaper at $120, plus it
uses the superior Omron optical switches we praised for the Hyperlight above.
Its configuration software is also entirely accessible over the web (for
Chromium-based browsers at least), so you donΓÇÖt have to download anything
extra to your PC.

However, we think the ViperΓÇÖs longer frame and ever-so-slightly more
concave sides keep it just a little comfier for larger hands and palm grips.
Its side buttons are still more satisfying to press and its finish provides
more grip. The Maya also follows the ΓÇ£leave the entire bottom of your mouse
exposedΓÇ¥ trend to reach its lower weight. And though the software being web-
based is great, it is very much a Chinese Gaming App with grammatical errors
and weird formatting quirks. The reality is that fine margins separate high-
end gaming mice nowadays ΓÇö the Maya X is good, but we prefer the Viper at
this size, while the Hitscan and CrazyLight are better for smaller hands.

Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2

The Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 is a close rival to the Razer Viper V3 Pro
for those who want a no-frills, high-end wireless gaming mouse. It has a
similar ΓÇ£potatoΓÇ¥-style shape, its tracking is similarly tremendous and
its optical-mechanical switches have a distinct feel. Unlike the first
Superlight, it also charges over USB-C. But the ViperΓÇÖs main clicks are
crisper and more pleasant-sounding, its side buttons aren't as mushy and its
scroll wheel is both firmer and grippier. ItΓÇÖs also slightly lighter.

The Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2. Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget Logitech G
Pro X Superlight 2 DEX

The G Pro X Superlight 2 DEX is the ergonomic version of the Superlight 2,
packing the same sensor and hybrid switches in a chunkier, right-handed
shape. We found its right side to flare out a little too much, though, often
leaving our pinky finger in a less-than-comfortable position. Those with
medium-sized hands may find its center hump to be too aggressive for
consistent aiming as well. The DeathAdder V3 ProΓÇÖs main buttons are still
more invitingly curved and consistent to press beyond that, while its coating
isnΓÇÖt as slippery. The DEXΓÇÖs scroll wheel is tighter, and all of its
internal tech is great, so by no means is this a poor choice. But at $180
after a tariff-related price hike, there are better values out there.

Razer Viper V3 HyperSpeed

Much like the DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed, RazerΓÇÖs Viper V3 HyperSpeed is a
lower-cost variant of the top-end Viper V3 Pro. (Confusing, we know.) At $70,
itΓÇÖs a solid value. Its symmetrical shape and soft-touch finish are
virtually identical to the more premium model, and though it technically has
a worse sensor, the drop-off is hardly noticeable. The main trade-off is that
itΓÇÖs heavier (about 82g), as it requires a AA battery for power. That
doesnΓÇÖt make it outright hefty, but you can feel the difference in
twitchier games. It uses older mechanical switches and smaller PTFE feet,
too, plus it lacks a port for connecting a cable. So itΓÇÖs not as close to
its big sibling as the mid-tier DeathAdder. Some may prefer that its DPI
button is located on the top of the mouse, though, and its simpler on-off
switch is nice.

Razer Basilisk V3 X HyperSpeed

The Razer Basilisk V3 X HyperSpeed is a more affordable wireless version of
the Basilisk V3 with the same comfortable shape and layout, plus a quieter
scroll wheel. Because it requires a AA battery for power, though, it weighs
around 115g. That's not great for fast-paced games. The scroll wheel canΓÇÖt
tilt left or right, either, nor can it switch between a ratcheted and free-
spin mode. It also uses less durable mechanical switches and only supports
one onboard profile. All that said, itΓÇÖs a decent value at $70.

Left to right: the Logitech G309 Lightspeed, the Razer Viper V3 HyperSpeed
and the Pulsar X2 V2. Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget Pulsar X2 V2

The $100 Pulsar X2 V2 is another decent option if you want a high-performing
symmetrical mouse for less than the Viper V3 Pro. ItΓÇÖs available in mini
and standard sizes: The former is a technically weightier (51 grams) version
of the X2 CrazyLight, while the latter is that but bigger. Both have sturdy
plastic frames, though theyΓÇÖre still meant for claw or fingertip grips
first. They also have cutouts across their undersides. As with the Xlite V3,
Pulsar now sells a newer model called the X2 V3, though thatΓÇÖs a minor
refresh with an updated sensor and 8K polling rate support. The latest model
is worth getting instead when the X2 V2 isnΓÇÖt discounted, but we prefer the
Hitscan Hyperlight and its more pleasing clicks to both in this price range.

Pwnage Stormbreaker

The Pwnage Stormbreaker is a superlight (51g), exceptionally sturdy and
premium-feeling wireless mouse thatΓÇÖs largely made from magnesium alloy
instead of plastic. It performs about on par with our top picks, which is
excellent, while its right-handed, medium-sized shape should suit palm and
claw grippers well. (If you know BenQΓÇÖs Zowie EC line, the shape is
basically that.) However, the extensive cutouts all over the sides and top
shell are noticeable in the hand and make the device more susceptible to
debris buildup than the DeathAdder V3 Pro. While the buttons and scroll wheel
are impressively tight, the main clicks are a bit too stiff and high-pitched
for our liking. We also noticed more connection stutters than usual on our
test PC, and itΓÇÖs expensive at $169.

BenQ Zowie U2

Speaking of BenQ, its Zowie U2 is a perfectly decent alternative to the Viper
V3 Pro that costs about $30 less. It tracks great, itΓÇÖs lightweight (60g)
and its mechanical clicks feel fine. It also comes with two receivers, one of
which doubles as a handy charging dock. It has a symmetrical shape with sides
that curve inwards and a decently-sized hump at the back; BenQ says itΓÇÖs
designed for claw grips, and it is indeed good for that, but it should also
work for fingertip grippers with larger hands or palm grippers with smaller
ones. Alas, the scroll wheel is gratingly loud and the plastic coating picks
up smudges and hand oils like itΓÇÖs its job. ThereΓÇÖs also no configuration
software, which can make adjusting settings a little cumbersome, though some
may prefer not having to install any extra bloat on their PC. This mouse also
maxes out at a 1,000Hz polling rate ΓÇö thatΓÇÖs not a big deal in practice,
but it's technically behind many other mice in this price range.

The Pwnage Stormbreaker (left) and BenQ Zowie U2 (right). Photo by Jeff Dunn
/ Engadget Logitech G309 Lightspeed

There isnΓÇÖt much wrong with the Logitech G309 Lightspeed in a vacuum.
ItΓÇÖs built like a tank, its sensor is accurate and its egg-like shape
should feel OK, if not superlative, in most hand sizes and grip types. It
uses the same hybrid switches as the G Pro X Superlight 2, so the clicks
donΓÇÖt sound great but are fast. It also has a supercapacitor inside, which
gives it effectively infinite battery life if you own LogitechΓÇÖs (costly)
PowerPlay charging mat. ThatΓÇÖs neat! Most people, though, will need to pop
in a AA battery, which pushes the weight up around 85 grams. As most of that
weight is felt toward the back, the mouse can feel relatively clunky to fling
around in FPS games. WeΓÇÖre not fans of the ugly recess across the middle of
the device, either, as it creates a space for dust to collect. At $90 after a
recent price hike, the G309 is still OK for casual types whoΓÇÖll only buy
from a name brand. But unless you use PowerPlay, it doesnΓÇÖt do much to
stand out from other options around the same price.

HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2

The HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 is a decent wired model for those who want a
flatter ambidextrous shape. It performs well for competitive play, and itΓÇÖs
plenty light (53g) thanks to a clever design with cutouts on the bottom that
are covered by the mouseΓÇÖs label. But the Endgame Gear OP1 8K is better-
built and more comfortable, so we think itΓÇÖs worth the extra cash. The
Razer Viper 8KHz was another solid (albeit heavier) option with a similar
shape, but that mouse has been discontinued.

A few more gaming mice we've tested. Left to right: the Glorious Model I 2
Wireless, the Razer Cobra Pro, the Razer Basilisk V3 X HyperSpeed and the
HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2. Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget HyperX Pulsefire
Haste 2 Core Wireless

The HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Core Wireless is a budget-friendly wireless
variant of the Haste 2. It may be OK if you must go wireless and only have
$50 to spend, as its shell feels sturdy and its low-profile shape is well-
suited to claw or fingertip grips. ItΓÇÖs a little weightier than the wired
Haste 2 (about 70g) since it runs on a AAA battery, but thatΓÇÖs nowhere near
heavy. That said, its main buttons feel somewhat mushy, and we observed a few
sensor hiccups and inconsistencies, particularly when we had HyperXΓÇÖs
Ngenuity software open.

HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Pro

We had persistent, debilitating connection issues with the HyperX Pulsefire
Haste 2 Pro on both Windows 11 and macOS over multiple days, so we canΓÇÖt
recommend it.

Logitech G502 X

The Logitech G502 X has a generally similar shape as the Razer Basilisk V3,
with a lower weight (84g) and more side buttons. However, its main buttons
are noisier, itΓÇÖs a slightly more awkward fit for most hands and its rubber
cable isnΓÇÖt as flexible. It's also much more expensive after Logitech's
recent round of price increases, plus it lacks RGB.

The HyperX Pulsefire Haste 2 Pro. Jeff Dunn for Engadget Logitech G203
Lightsync

The Logitech G203 Lightsync is our former budget pick. ItΓÇÖs often available
in the $20 to $30 range these days, and at that price itΓÇÖs still fine if
you want a competent gaming mouse for as little money as possible. You can
feel the cost cutting in its rubbery cable and mushy scroll wheel, however,
and its shape is a bit too small and flat for larger hands. The Logitech G305
Lightspeed is a wireless model with more or less the same shape, but it
requires a AA battery to work and thus weighs just over 100g. It, too, feels
somewhat outdated in 2025.

Razer Cobra

The Razer Cobra is another value-oriented wired mouse with a compact shape.
ItΓÇÖs much lighter (58g) than the Logitech G203, with a more flexible cable
and optical switches instead of mechanical ones. It's usually priced between
$35 and $40, though, so the G203 is typically cheaper. The Endgame Gear OP1
8K still feels higher-quality across the board, but if you have smaller
hands, use a fingertip grip and want a symmetrical mouse on the cheap, go for
it.

The Logitech G203 Lightsync Jeff Dunn / Engadget Alienware Pro Wireless
Gaming Mouse

The Alienware Pro Wireless Gaming Mouse tracks well, glides smoothly and
weighs just under 60 grams without having any holes in its outer shell.
ItΓÇÖs shaped like a Logitech G Pro X Lightspeed 2 with wider sides, so it
should be comfortable for palm or claw grippers with large or medium-sized
hands. Its matte finish is a touch too slippery, however, and its main
buttons arenΓÇÖt as consistent or satisfying to press as our top picks
(despite using Omron optical switches). Clicking them toward the top is too
soft, clicking them toward the back is too stiff. The back side button sounds
hollow beyond that, and AlienwareΓÇÖs configuration software chews up far too
much memory. All of this is overpriced at $150.

Glorious Model I 2 Wireless

ThereΓÇÖs a fair amount to like about the Glorious Model I 2 Wireless: an
ergonomic shape thatΓÇÖs reminiscent of the Basilisk V3/G502 X but lighter at
75g, four customizable side buttons, the ability to connect over a USB
receiver or Bluetooth, a smooth scroll wheel and tasteful RGB lighting, all
for $100. However, its honeycomb-style design and mechanical switches both
raise concerns about its long-term durability.

Glorious Model D 2 Wireless

The Glorious Model D 2 Wireless also has holes all over its shell yet
doesnΓÇÖt perform or feel significantly better than other mice around the
$100 mark. Other reviews say it has latency issues as well.

Glorious Model D 2 Pro + Model O 2 Pro

The ergonomic Model D 2 Pro and symmetrical Model O 2 Pro arenΓÇÖt loaded
with cutouts, meanwhile, but their main buttons are relatively loud and
sticky-feeling.

The Alienware Pro Wireless Gaming Mouse. Jeff Dunn for Engadget What to look
for in a gaming mouse Wired vs. wireless

Buying a wireless gaming mouse used to mean sacrificing a certain level of
responsiveness, but thankfully, thatΓÇÖs no longer the case. Over the last
few years, wireless connectivity has improved to the point where the
difference in latency between a good wireless model and a tried-and-true
wired gaming mouse is barely perceptible.

Note, however, that weΓÇÖre strictly talking about mice that use a 2.4GHz
connection (over a USB dongle), not Bluetooth. Many of the best wireless
gaming mouse models support both connection options, which is great for
travel, but BluetoothΓÇÖs latency is generally too high to be reliable for
gaming.

Going wireless still has other trade-offs, too. Battery life is improving all
the time, but with their higher performance demands and RGB lighting, most
wireless gaming mice usually don't last as long as "normal" wireless models.
You shouldnΓÇÖt expect more than a few days of power from a rechargeable
gaming mouse you use regularly. Some gaming mice offer wireless charging too,
which makes things easier. Good wireless gaming mice usually come at a much
higher cost than their wired counterparts as well.

ThatΓÇÖs not to say the premium is never worth it: Who wants yet another
cable on their desk? You may need a wireless model if you hate the feel of
ΓÇ£cable dragΓÇ¥ or if your gaming PC is located in an awkward spot. Many
wireless gaming mice come with a cable you can hook up in a pinch as well.
But if price is your primary concern, a good wired mouse may be a better
value.

Comfort and grip types

EveryoneΓÇÖs hands are different, so at the end of the day, calling one mouse
ΓÇ£more comfortableΓÇ¥ than another is mostly subjective. Ensuring your
comfort is the most essential step when buying any mouse, though, so weΓÇÖve
done our best to consider how each device we tested works with smaller,
average-sized and larger hands alike.

We also considered how each peripheral accommodates the three grip styles
most people use while holding a mouse: palm, fingertip and claw. As a
refresher, a palm grip is when your whole hand rests on the mouse, with your
fingers resting flat on the main buttons. A fingertip grip is when you steer
the mouse solely with the tips of your fingers, with your palm not in contact
with the device at all. A claw grip is when your palm only touches the back
edge of the mouse, with your fingers arched in a claw-like shape toward the
buttons.

In general, most people use a palm grip, which tends to offer the greatest
sense of control ΓÇö though, depending on the size of your hand, you may need
your mouse to be a specific length to use it comfortably. A fingertip grip
can allow for more rapid movements, while a claw grip is something of a
balance between the two. Switch and Click has a good breakdown if youΓÇÖd
like more detail, but weΓÇÖve noted above if a mouse isnΓÇÖt well-suited for
a particular grip style. For what itΓÇÖs worth, yours truly is a claw gripper
most of the time.

Jeff Dunn for Engadget Build quality and design

A good gaming mouse feels sturdy and wonΓÇÖt flex or creak when used
strenuously. We valued mice without any overly sharp angles or grooves that
could be awkward for most people to hold. And while most gaming mice have
plastic exteriors, not all plastic is created equal, so we looked for
finishes that were smooth, not too slick and capable of withstanding the
sweaty palms that often come with competitive gaming sessions.

The gaming mouse market is mostly split between two design styles: ergonomic
and ambidextrous. Ergonomic mice are almost always made with right-handed
users in mind and often feature dedicated thumb rests. Ambidextrous mice are
more symmetrical and designed to be used with either hand (though they may
not have extra buttons on both sides). Whether an ergonomic or ambidextrous
gaming mouse works best for you is largely a matter of personal preference.

A gaming mouseΓÇÖs feet, meanwhile, should provide a consistent glide and
reduce the friction between your mouse and mouse pad beneath it as much as
possible. For the best performance, look for feet made from PTFE (aka
Teflon). All feet will eventually wear down, but many mice come with spares,
and most manufacturers sell replacements if needed.

As for flashy RGB lighting, itΓÇÖs a nice bonus, but little more than that.
Still, if youΓÇÖve already kitted out your setup with RGB, having a mouse
with adjustable lighting effects can add to the gaming experience (and more
consumer tech could stand to do things for pleasureΓÇÖs sake). More
practically, some mice let you assign custom lighting settings to separate
profiles, which can make it easier to see which one youΓÇÖre currently using.

Weight

Gaming mice have gotten lighter and lighter over the years, with some recent
releases weighing less than 30 grams. Your mouse doesnΓÇÖt need to be that
feathery ΓÇö anything under 80g is still reasonably light, and itΓÇÖs not
like a 100g mouse feels like a total anchor. Regardless, a lightweight mouse
makes it easier to pull off fast movements repeatedly, with less inertia.
That said, some players still enjoy a little bit of bulk in their gaming
mouse (relatively speaking), especially with games that arenΓÇÖt as reliant
on twitchy reactions.

To reach those lightest weights, some manufacturers have released gaming mice
with ΓÇ£honeycombΓÇ¥-style designs, which feature an array of cutouts in the
outer shell. These mice can still perform great, but having a bunch of holes
that expose the internal circuit board to possible sweat, dust and detritus
isnΓÇÖt the best for long-term durability. If a mouse must have cutouts, it's
better if they're relegated to the bottom of the design, where debris is less
likely to enter the frame.

Jeff Dunn for Engadget Switches, buttons and scroll wheel

A growing number of gaming mice use optical switches instead of mechanical
ones. Since these involve fewer bits making physical contact, they should
generally be more durable and less prone to unwanted ΓÇ£double-clicksΓÇ¥ over
time. Many gamers still find good mechanical switches more satisfying to
press, so it's not like you should avoid mechanical mice altogether. They
just carry a little more long-term risk in a vacuum.

Since most people will use their gaming mouse as their mouse-mouse, you may
want main buttons that have a softer feel when pressed, with enough travel to
make inadvertent actuations less frequent. But even that is a matter of
preference: You may want lighter buttons if you play games that call for
constant clicking. We also looked to testing from sites like Rtings to ensure
each mouse we recommend has a sufficiently low click latency, meaning your
clicks will register with minimal lag.

Beyond the standard click panels, a good gaming mouse should also have
programmable buttons for quick macros or shortcuts. For most games, shoot for
at least two extra buttons on the thumb-side panel that are easy to reach and
difficult to press by accident. Many mice have more buttons, which can be a
plus, but not if they force you to contort your fingers to avoid hitting
them. For MMO mice, having at least 12 side buttons is preferable in order to
access as many hotbar commands as possible.

As for the scroll wheel, it should have distinct, ratcheted ΓÇ£stepsΓÇ¥ that
arenΓÇÖt too resistant but make it clear when youΓÇÖve actually scrolled. Its
texture should be grippy, and it shouldn't make a distracting amount of noise
when used. The wheel should also be clickable, giving you another input to
customize for certain games (e.g., to control the zoom on a sniper rifle).

Sensors and performance

Some are more proficient than others, but generally speaking, the optical
sensors built into most modern gaming mice are more than fast and accurate
enough for most peopleΓÇÖs needs.

While shopping for gaming mice, youΓÇÖll see a number of terms related to
sensor performance. To be clear, a gaming mouseΓÇÖs responsiveness doesnΓÇÖt
come down to just one spec. But for clarityΓÇÖs sake, hereΓÇÖs a rundown of
the more noteworthy jargon:

DPI, or dots per inch, is a measure of a mouseΓÇÖs sensitivity. The higher
the DPI setting, the more your cursor will move with every inch you move the
mouse itself. Many gaming mice advertise extremely high DPIs that top out
above 30,000, but thatΓÇÖs largely marketing fluff: Few people play above
3,000, with 800 a common sweet spot. This concept is also referred to as CPI
(counts per inch), which is probably the more accurate term, though DPI is
used more often.

IPS, or inches per second, refers to the maximum velocity a mouse sensor
supports. The higher the IPS, the faster you can move the mouse before it
becomes incapable of tracking motions correctly.

Acceleration goes with IPS. In this context, it refers to how many Gs a mouse
can withstand before it starts to track inaccurately.

Polling rate is a measure of how often a mouse tells a computer where it is.
In general, the more frequently your mouse reports information to your PC,
the more predictable its response time should be. Anything at 500Hz or above
is fine for casual gaming. The sweet spot for most is 1,000Hz. Many newer
mice can go all the way up to 8,000Hz, but you start to see diminishing
returns the higher you go unless own a powerful PC and play on a gaming
monitor with an especially high refresh rate. Even then, a super-high polling
rate is far from essential. Not all games are built with it in mind, plus it
leads to much faster battery drain.

Lift-off distance is the height at which a mouseΓÇÖs sensor stops tracking
the surface below it. Many competitive players like this to be as low as
possible in order to avoid unintended cursor movements while repositioning
their mouse.

A screenshot of Razer's Synapse 4 software. Razer Software and onboard memory


It doesnΓÇÖt take long to find horror stories about bugs and other niggling
issues caused by gaming mouse software, so the ideal app is one that
doesnΓÇÖt force you to use it all the time. It should let you adjust as many
of the aspects above as possible, ideally to several distinct profiles.
Preferably, you can save your settings directly to the mouse itself, letting
you pick your customizations back up on another device without having to
redownload any software. All this is most important on Windows, but Mac
compatibility is always good to have.

Warranty and customer support

Most major gaming mice brands offer warranties between one and three years.
The longer and more extensive a manufacturerΓÇÖs program is, the better. This
is the case with most consumer tech, but we note it here because the gaming
mouse market is particularly flush with products from less-than-household
names, many of which you may see hyped up on YouTube, Reddit or elsewhere
around the web. A bunch of these more obscure mice are genuinely great, but
if you ever buy from a more niche brand, itΓÇÖs worth checking that some
level of customer support is in place. WeΓÇÖve made sure our picks for the
best gaming mice arenΓÇÖt riddled with an abnormal amount of poor user
reviews.

Recent updates

June 2025: WeΓÇÖve added a couple new alternate picks in the Hitscan
Hyperlight and Pulsar X2 CrazyLight. WeΓÇÖve removed the Lamzu Atlantis OG V2
4K as an honorable mention as a result, along with a couple other mice that
no longer appear to be available. All other details should be up-to-date. The
gaming mouse market remains an extremely busy one, so itΓÇÖs difficult for us
to review everything. That said, weΓÇÖre currently testing a few other recent
releases from Corsair and ASUS, and weΓÇÖre keeping an eye out for potential
updates to a couple of our picks from Razer and Endgame Gear.

November 2024: WeΓÇÖve updated this guide with testing notes on the Logitech
G Pro X Superlight 2 DEX. WeΓÇÖve also added mentions of the Razer Basilisk
V3 35K and Pulsar Xlite V4, two recently released updates to a couple of our
current picks. We aim to test those more fully, alongside a few others, for
our next update.

September 2024: We've completely refreshed this guide for late 2024, adding
new main picks based on shape alongside notes on several other gaming mice
we've tested in recent months. We're now in the process of testing Logitech's
new G Pro X Superlight 2 DEX, a flagship ergonomic mouse that the company
announced right as we were putting the finishing touches on this update.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at
https://www.engadget.com/gaming/pc/best-gamin...

---
VRSS v2.1.180528