AT2k Design BBS Message Area
Casually read the BBS message area using an easy to use interface. Messages are categorized exactly like they are on the BBS. You may post new messages or reply to existing messages! You are not logged in. Login here for full access privileges. |
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Engadget is a web magazine with... <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
|
||||||
From | To | Subject | Date/Time | |||
![]() |
VRSS | All | Skullcandy Method 360 ANC review: A cheaper version of Boses |
May 26, 2025 8:00 AM |
||
Feed: Engadget is a web magazine with obsessive daily coverage of everything new in gadgets and consumer electronics Feed Link: https://www.engadget.com/ --- Title: Skullcandy Method 360 ANC review: A cheaper version of BoseΓÇÖs best earbuds, with a few key sacrifices Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 13:00:47 +0000 Link: https://www.engadget.com/audio/headphones/sku... Skullcandy isnΓÇÖt a name that usually comes to mind when you think of premium headphones. The Utah-based company has primarily made its name in the budget space, selling more on low prices and loud, sports-heavy marketing than the promise of excellent sound quality. With the new Method 360 ANC, the audio maker is trying to change that by latching onto another brand entirely. Skullcandy proudly boasts that its latest wireless earbuds feature ΓÇ£sound by Bose,ΓÇ¥ which is to say that Bose has supplied the acoustic tuning, ear tips and overall shape of the device. In fact, the new buds look quite similar to BoseΓÇÖs QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds from afar. But that upscale pair retails for $299 and the Method 360 ANC only costs $130 (or as low as $100 at third-party stores of this writing). So has Skullcandy managed to capture the best of Bose at a more affordable price? Kind of. Design and features The Method 360 ANC is indeed roughly as comfortable as the QuietComfort Ultra. Each earpiece is slightly heavier and more plastic-y ΓÇö and BoseΓÇÖs pair was already on the bulky side ΓÇö but the soft ear gels and stability fins help them fit snug without creating too much pressure. I had no issues with them coming loose over several weeks of testing. The earbuds have an IPX4 water-resistance rating ΓÇö not the best, but enough to survive most peopleΓÇÖs workouts. The larger frame creates more space for the side touch panels, and all the controls do work reliably, which isnΓÇÖt a given in the $100 range. These earbuds also come with most of the features youΓÇÖd want from a modern pair. There are active noise cancellation (ANC) and ambient sound modes. Battery life is fine at eight to 11-ish hours, depending on ANC usage. They can dependably connect to two devices simultaneously, and they work with GoogleΓÇÖs Fast Pair tech on Android devices. They support wear detection, too, and there are three different sets of ear gels and fins in the box. Any settings tweaks IΓÇÖve made in SkullcandyΓÇÖs Skull-iQ app have taken effect quickly, and in general the software is easy to navigate. The only major omissions here are the lack of wireless charging and a short one-year warranty. The Method 360 ANC is almost identical to Bose's QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds in terms of design. For this review, we mainly compared the new Skullcandy buds against the QC Ultras and Anker's Soundcore Space A40, the top pick in our budget earbuds buying guide. Jeff Dunn for Engadget Sound quality Once you start listening to the Method 360 ANC, though, you start to see why itΓÇÖs priced under $150. The default sound signature is extremely V-shaped: The bass is massive, the treble is bright and everything in between is recessed. Bass lovers should appreciate this with hip-hop, dance music and many pop songs. A track like Kendrick LamarΓÇÖs ΓÇ£DNAΓÇ¥ becomes particularly easy to rock to: The low-end is deep and impactful, while a giant spike around the upper midrange keeps the vocals clear throughout. In general, the Method 360 ANC is a step up from the Anker Soundcore Space A40, the longtime top pick in our guide to the best earbuds under $100. That pair is far more muffled in the treble, whereas the Skullcandy pairΓÇÖs crisper, more extended highs tend to make songs feel less closed-off. That said, itΓÇÖs very easy to see how this kind of signature could get fatiguing over time. ItΓÇÖs consistently intense, and the recessed mids cause it to lose details in moderately intricate compositions. An indie rock track like Hop AlongΓÇÖs ΓÇ£The KnockΓÇ¥ is a bit of a mess, as the bassline and crunchy rhythm guitar overwhelm the lead guitar riffs and rob the raspy vocals of air. With AmericaΓÇÖs ΓÇ£Ventura Highway,ΓÇ¥ the folksy acoustic guitar comes through clearly, but the overemphasized treble makes ΓÇ£essΓÇ¥ sounds a touch too sharp. The QuietComfort Ultra doesnΓÇÖt exactly sound neutral, but it always comes off as more balanced by comparison. Skullcandy has also omitted support for higher-quality Bluetooth codecs, so it only supports the basic SBC and AAC. All of this is still better-than-average for bassheads shopping in this price range ΓÇö just donΓÇÖt expect it to compete very far beyond that. Thankfully, you can rein in some of the default profileΓÇÖs excesses with a custom EQ in SkullcandyΓÇÖs app. The charging case is on the larger side, to put it mildly, and uses a sliding mechanism to open and close. Jeff Dunn for Engadget ANC, ambient sound, call quality and one funky case SkullcandyΓÇÖs ANC is perfectly respectable for $130, and itΓÇÖs great you can customize the intensity of the noise-canceling effect via the app. But itΓÇÖs not on the level of the QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds or even the step- down QuietComfort Earbuds. It cuts out a fair chunk of the bassy rumble of an NYC subway train, but higher-pitched screeches and stop announcements are very much audible with music playing at moderate volumes. The ΓÇ£Stay AwareΓÇ¥ (ambient sound) mode, meanwhile, is passable but nothing more; itΓÇÖs one of those deals where you need to keep the volume somewhat low to ensure you can hear yourself clearly. Call quality isnΓÇÖt great, either: The mic does well to limit background noise, but it struggles with wind and makes your voice sound noticeably thin and processed. My testing partner said it made me sound like I was in an elevator. My biggest complaint, however, is with the ginormous tube of a case. ItΓÇÖs comically large next to pairs like the QuietComfort Ultra or Space A40, so much so that I have to question just how spacious Skullcandy thinks most peopleΓÇÖs pockets are. There is a built-in clip that lets you hook the case to a bag or belt loop, but as a resident of New York City, I will never be comfortable sauntering around with anything of value dangling on my person. Actually snapping the earbuds back into the case is cumbersome as well: You have to slide the case open, then flip the earpieces upside down and insert them on opposite sides. I can understand wanting to make something unique, but this is an instance where boring wouldΓÇÖve been better. The Method 360 ANC's case has a built-in clip for attaching to bags or belt loops. Jeff Dunn for Engadget Wrap-up The Method 360 ANC has its problems, but most of them arenΓÇÖt too surprising for a relatively affordable pair of wireless earbuds (oversized case aside). DonΓÇÖt be fooled into thinking the Bose branding means youΓÇÖre getting a Bose-level product ΓÇö the real-deal QuietComfort Earbuds are better if youΓÇÖre willing to pay more. But this is still a tier above most budget pairs weΓÇÖve tested. It has nearly all the features weΓÇÖre looking for (unlike, say, the Beats Solo Buds), itΓÇÖs comfortable and the sound signature will hit right if youΓÇÖre hungry for bass. At its normal $130, itΓÇÖs well worth considering for bassheads who can go one rung above the bargain bin. For $100 or less, itΓÇÖs a great value. Just make room for that case. This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/audio/headphones/sku... cheaper-version-of-boses-best-earbuds-with-a-few-key-sacrifices- 130047025.html?src=rss --- VRSS v2.1.180528 |
||||||
|
Previous Message | Next Message | Back to Engadget is a web magazine with... <-- <--- | Return to Home Page |
![]() Execution Time: 0.018 seconds If you experience any problems with this website or need help, contact the webmaster. VADV-PHP Copyright © 2002-2025 Steve Winn, Aspect Technologies. All Rights Reserved. Virtual Advanced Copyright © 1995-1997 Roland De Graaf. |